“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage


The current research examined the observed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that almost all the individuals had been influenced by the social stress placed upon them. More over, the individuals observed the generation that is previous “racist”. But, interestingly you will how to delete hot or not account find signs and symptoms of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent of this participants failed to wish to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 percent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.

This is certainly a preview of registration content, access via your institution.

Access choices

Purchase solitary article

Access immediately into the full article PDF.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Contribute to journal

Immediate on the web access to any or all dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.


It ought to be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps not appropriate into the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention would be to date exclusively (but, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the make an effort to get hitched. More over, in some instances, the approval for the female’s dad ( or other significant male figure) is necessary to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the number of the information so that you can respect individuals’ cultural traditions and observing that is religious.


Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, and also the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test for the contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex plus the social context of love and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and love that is romantic the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Communication community participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American life. Indication, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Discussion in social support systems. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Nyc: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social networking features aided by the passage through of some time relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a partnership. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Cultural factors within the variety of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Factors, patterns, styles. Annual Review of Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of Women in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Social effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies additionally the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems therefore the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt reduction concept. Human Communication Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of internet sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens associated with network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race mixture: Boundary crossing in relative perspective. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: the creative art and types of qualitative interview studies. Nyc: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). When training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort marketing training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not absolutely all love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Middle East Journal.